NSBA Legal Clips
Archived entries for disability

DOJ settles with Massachusetts college agreeing that food allergy may be disability under ADA

According to an Associated Press report in the Longview Daily News, the U.S. Department of Justice recently settled a suit with Lesley University in Washington over accommodating students with food allergies.

Continue reading...

Parents sue Pennsylvania district for failure to identify and evaluate student for disabilities

According to a report on timesonline.com, the Big Beaver Falls Area School District is the target of a proposed class action suit by the parents of a special needs student, who claims the district failed to identify and evaluate him for disabilities.

Continue reading...

Jury rejects teacher’s claim that California district failed to accommodate his diabetes

The Palo Alto Daily News reports that after brief deliberations, a San Mateo County civil jury returned a verdict rejecting Manuel Delgado’s claim that the Sequoia Union High School District refused to provide him with accommodations for his diabetes and anxiety disorder.

Continue reading...

Sua Sponte: NSBA urges Eleventh Circuit to preserve the high deliberate indifference standard in disability-based harassment cases

On November 28, 2012, NSBA, along with three other education organizations, filed an amici curiae brief in Long v. Murray County School District, now before the Eleventh Circuit, to assist the appellate court in its review of the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, as to whether it “correctly concluded, relying on Davis v. Monroe Cnty. Bd. of Educ., that [the parents of a special education student] had not presented evidence of ‘deliberate indifference’ required to establish a peer-on-peer harassment claim” under Section 504 or the ADA.

Continue reading...

Pennsylvania district sued by student with nut allergy for disability harassment

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that a suit has been filed on behalf a student, identified as T.F., alleging that the Fox Chapel Area School District violated the federal Rehabilitation Act, resulting in “disability-based harassment”, by failing to adequately address T.F.’s severe allergy to tree nuts, and subjected him to ridicule by seating him alone in the cafeteria.

Continue reading...

Trial of teacher’s suit against California district for failure to accommodate diabetes comes to a close

The Palo Alto Daily News reports that after rejecting a negotiated settlement, the trial of Manuel Delgado’s suit of disability discrimination against Sequoia Union High School District is coming to a close.

Continue reading...

Federal appellate court rules that Pennsylvania district did not deny FAPE to student even prior to formal identification

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that portions of a family’s claim for compensatory education under the IDEA and Section 504 were time barred by IDEA’s two-year statute of limitations. In examining the scope of the limitations period, an issue of first impression for any federal appellate court, the panel concluded that neither of the IDEA’s two statutory exceptions to the limitations period, nor the common law equitable tolling doctrines, was applicable to the parents’ claim.

Continue reading...

DOJ sues Mississippi officials for operating a “school to prison pipeline” mainly affecting minority and disabled students

The Associated Press reports in The Washington Post that the U.S. Department of Justice has filed a federal lawsuit against government officials in the city of Meridian and Lauderdale County, Mississippi, accusing officials of operating a “school-to-prison pipeline” that locks up students for infractions like flatulence or wearing the wrong color socks, a policy that mainly affects black and disabled students.

Continue reading...

Tenth Circuit holds that ADA Amendments of 2008 do not apply retroactively to state or federal claims

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Albuquerque Public Schools, dismissing a teacher’s discrimination claim brought under the New Mexico Human Rights Act. The panel held that the definition of “disability” under the ADA Amendments of 2008 was not applicable retroactively to the teacher’s state-law claim, rejecting the teacher’s assertion that because the state court would have applied those standards retroactively, the federal district court should have done so too.

Continue reading...

Federal appellate court’s ruling sustains jury verdict in favor of teacher with seasonal affective disorder claiming ADA violation

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a Wisconsin federal district court’s decision to deny a school district’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, letting stand a jury verdict in favor of a teacher with seasonal affective disorder who claimed the school district failed to accommodate her disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Continue reading...

Page 1 of 3123

 



NSBA

Copyright © National School Boards Association. All rights reserved.
1680 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: (703) 838-6722 Fax: (703) 683-7590 E-mail: info@nsba.org

RSS Feed.